Applying neuroanatomical distinctions to connectionist cognitive modelling

نویسندگان

  • Padraic Monaghan
  • Richard Shillcock
چکیده

We show examples of how low-level, qualitative neuroanatomical hemispheric differences can give rise to detailed psychologically realistic behaviour. We illustrate this claim with examples from the cognitive modelling of unilateral visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. Our models are based on two principles: the division of information processing between the two hemispheres; and the implementation of a coarse-/finecoding distinction between the hemispheres. Line-bisection is a standard test for visuospatial neglect, in which the patient is required to mark the centre of a straight line; in neglect caused by right-hemisphere (RH) damage, bisection points tend to be displaced to the right of centre. Models of neglect have been focussed on dysfunctions following RH damage; however, patients with comparable damage to the left hemisphere (LH) typically present with a different pattern of deficits: (a) damage to the LH less often results in visuospatial neglect, or results in smaller, more variable displacements in line-bisection; (b) when damage to the LH results in neglect, recovery is generally quicker; and (c) damage to the LH often results in neglect dyslexia without more general visuospatial neglect. These asymmetries present a challenge to current models of neglect. Our models provide a principled and parsimonious account.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Artificial Neural Networks and Cognitive Modelling

In their heyday, artificial neural networks promised a radically new approach to cognitive modelling. The connectionist approach spawned a number of influential, and controversial, cognitive models. In this article, we consider the main characteristics of the approach, look at the factors leading to its enthusiastic adoption, and discuss the extent to which it differs from earlier computational...

متن کامل

Evaluating computational models in cognitive neuropsychology: the case from the consonant/vowel distinction.

Caramazza et al. [Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403(6768), 428-430.] report two patients who exhibit a double dissociation between consonants and vowels in speech production. The patterning of this double dissociation cannot be explained by appealing to sub-phonemic distinctions, such as sonority level or da...

متن کامل

Connectionist Models

Connectionist models, also known as Parallel Distributed Processing (PDP) models, are a class of computational models often used to model aspects of human perception, cognition, and behaviour, the learning processes underlying such behaviour, and the storage and retrieval of information from memory. The approach embodies a particular perspective in cognitive science, one that is based on the id...

متن کامل

Unclear Distinctions Lead to Unnecessary Shortcomings: Examining the Rule Vs Fact, Role Vs Ller, and Type Vs Predicate Distinctions from a Connectionist Representation and Reasoning Perspective

Unclear Distinctions lead to Unnecessary Shortcomings: Examining the rule vs fact, role vs ller, and type vs predicate distinctions from a connectionist representation and reasoning perspective Venkat Ajjanagadde Wilhelm-Schickard Institute, Universitaet Tuebingen Sand 13, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany [email protected] Abstract This paper deals with three distinctions perta...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996